Remember the state’s Master Plan for Higher Education?

In 1960, California legislators joined with education leaders to develop and implement a visionary plan for higher education in California.

This plan saw education as the economic engine of the state, opening educational and economic opportunities to Californians who had been previously excluded.

The Master Plan laid out a system where the state’s top 12.5% of high school graduates would be accepted to UC, the top 33% accepted to the California State University, and anyone could go to the state’s community colleges at no cost.

Imagine: no student fees!

Back then, student fees were nearly zero and the state contributed more than 20% of UC’s budget.

Today, the state only contributes 7% of UC’s budget, while fees, books and housing add up to $30,000/year. Students who qualify for loans graduate with overwhelming debt. Many never come to UC, or drop out because of the immense financial burden.

We are working with unions, student groups, faculty, and anyone else interested in re-kindling the Master Plan’s vision. Our future looks so much brighter when we have affordable, accessible education of the highest quality.

Showing 6 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • patric iaisa
    commented 2018-11-09 01:16:20 -0800
    The 106th Grey Cup will be played to decide the Canadian Football League (CFL) championship for the 2018 season. The game will be televised in Canada …
  • patric iaisa
    commented 2018-11-09 01:12:16 -0800
    It is now certain the Miss Universe 2018 will hold in Bangkok, Thailand. This is not the first time this event is holding in the country. It now appears that the event will hold in that country for every thirteen years. The last time it was held in the country was in 2005. The occasion will give a big boost to the tourism industry in the country.
  • James A. Daye James A. Daye
    commented 2018-03-11 07:54:12 -0700
    We have to remember that the plan is not very good nor bad, but it is essential for the current generation. There are some blogs who say that the plan is no adequate. But, I hope now it is necessary to continue the plan.
  • Stephen Rowan
    commented 2017-06-07 22:13:42 -0700
    I come here after quite a while since 2016 and entire this term i have miss the chance to get information from a bona fide source you are returned this opposition which is exceptionally cheering for me.If you need any paper assistance or advice or help – do not hesitate to surf
  • David Milroy
    commented 2015-11-11 10:18:41 -0800
    I would like to caution people who advocate for reducing student fees and increasing government support for education..WITHOUT saying anything about how that funding should be spent! It would be easy for community colleges and universities to lower their costs and pass the savings on to students..KEEP EXPLOITING CONTINGENT FACULTY!!!!! Over the past 50 years..more money to the “system” has meant higher salaries for administrators (who never even talk to students!) and tenured faculty…and ever-increasing reliance on under-paid adjuncts and lecturers. You can’t stop exploitation by increasing funding..THEY WILL FIND PLACES TO PUT MORE FUNDING and STILL NOT stop exploiting contingent faculty. Then, they will eventually come back and ask students for more money for more raisies for administrators! STOP THE EXPLOITATION OF ADJUNCTY FCULTY!!!!!
  • Amy Hines
    published this page in Blog 2014-12-17 21:20:51 -0800